It’s obvious to many of us, but many large companies say one thing and do another. At its worst, this leads to the funding of climate deniers in powerful positions and the spreading of false information about climate change.
We recently read a piece on The Conversation about corporate lobbying, and we were inspired to share a few words of our own. So today we’re going to talk about the term ‘greenwashing’ and what it means for brands of all sizes.
We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again: it’s time for big companies to change.
In 2008, energy company Shell published an advert saying:
“The challenge of the 21st century is to meet the growing need for energy in ways that are not only profitable but sustainable.”
As it turns out, the Advertising Standards Authority pulled their ad for being misleading. Their latest, supposedly “sustainable” oil sands project was in fact an incredibly dirty method of producing energy. Far from reducing emissions, a study showed that it would “increase the total overall emissions” of the Shell refinery.
This came a year after the oil giant got into trouble for misleading the public with an advert that showed flowers coming out of refinery chimneys. Their implied claim, that they recycle waste CO2 to grow flowers, was found to be a huge exaggeration.
So is this ‘greenwashing’, or just blatant lying? There’s a lot of overlap, but let’s get into the definition — and threat — of corporate greenwashing.
Corporate greenwashing, as defined by the experts, is when a company “spends more time and money claiming to be “green” through advertising and marketing than actually implementing business practices that minimize environmental impact”.
If a company shouts about its sustainable credentials, yet doesn’t really do enough to warrant the claims, then they are greenwashing.
Our examples from Shell are greenwashing at its purest. But oil companies are far from the only ones taking part.
Sustainability sells, so it’s obvious that brands want to get in on the act.
The article we mentioned earlier, from The Conversation, talks about the dangers of companies going one step further — making ‘green’ claims yet lobbying against climate action. They cite Exxon Mobil as clear offenders.
The danger of greenwashing is that the public is deceived and continues to unknowingly fund dirty, profit-over-everything companies.
We can all be more switched-on as consumers, but what chance have we got when we’re being lied to en-masse? It’s time for large corporations to reject the old way of doing business. That way is dead.
After the excitement of the World Cup, we wrote about how Mastercard’s sponsorship efforts were all wrong. In that example — and in cases of greenwashing — promotion overshadowed action.
It’s not enough to stick a green label on a product and say you’ve done your bit. What structural changes can your company make to ensure the world is better than when you found it? That’s a big question, but it’s what modern, progressive leaders should be asking themselves.
Take the positive example of energy company Ecotricity. They use 100% green electricity and don’t charge the world for it. They’ve successfully communicated their sustainable credentials and they’re making the profits they deserve.
With those figures at stake, it’s a risk not to adopt a more sustainable approach.
But lying or exaggerating will not work. You will be caught out and your company will suffer. Learn the lessons from Shell and Mastercard.
Rhys is Conscious Creatives' resident writer and photographer. His work has been published in various online publications, and he was recently chosen to update a bestselling book on SEO. He continues to seek new and interesting angles for his photography work, shooting his local streets on 35mm film.
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.